On the subject of the Trump Mideast Peace Plan, I agree with both The Economist which says, “as a blueprint for a two-state solution it was dead on arrival,” and with the Globe and Mail’s Mark MacKinnon who writes that “President Donald Trump’s Middle East peace plan … aims to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict almost…… Continue reading The Trump Peace Plan
A bit more than a year ago I discussed a proposal for a G-9 which was dubbed ‘The Committee to Save the World Order.’ Sometime later, I discussed how such a group, I called it a G-X, might displace the G-20. Now, I see that last September, France and Germany formed just such a group:…… Continue reading The Alliance for Multilateralism (AKA the committee to save the world)
A couple of days ago I said that “What we don’t know is … How did PS752 crash, in a ball of fire, just minutes after takeoff? Was it an engine explosion or is the intelligence that Prime Minister Trudeau says he has accurate? Did Iranians shoot it down with a surface-to-air missile?” Well, now, according…… Continue reading Something we finally do know
What we do know, for sure, is that: Qassem Soleimani is dead. That is, without a shadow of a doubt, a good thing. He was a monster and his demise makes the world an ever so slightly better place. We should not dance on anyone’s grave, not even those of Hitler, Stalin, Tojo and Mao,…… Continue reading What we know and don’t know, for sure, so far
John Ibitson, writing in the Globe and Mail, suggests that Justin Trudeau might want to try what former diplomat, national strategic planner in the Privy Council Office, and commentator David Mulroney refers to (on social media) as… … “the “Ostrich” school of Canadian foreign policy.” It has, he says, two pillars: First, “Canada has no…… Continue reading But that may prove impossible.
I see, on the CP24 News website, that Canada’s Defence Minister Harjot Sajjan said, at the Halifax International Security Forum, that ““We don’t consider China as an adversary” …[and he added] … “We do have two Canadians that have been arbitrarily detained in China and we ask China for their expeditious release and that’s extremely…… Continue reading Arrant bloody nonsense
Two items in the Globe and Mail caught my eye: First, Adam Tooze, a professor of history, and director of the European Institute, at Columbia University writes that “Mr. Trump’s trade policy is a strange mélange. It represents not one single coherent response to globalization, but a series of reactions superimposed one on top of the…… Continue reading Will the (possible) US-China trade deal be bad for Canada?
As I have been saying over the past few days and weeks … and months, the global strategic situation is changing, as it always does. In the last 500 years we have watched the decline Spain, then the rise and fall of the Netherlands, France, Britain, Japan, Germany and the Soviet Union and the rise…… Continue reading The world is changing … Canada must change, too
This is the fifth of five of my ‘thoughts’ on diverse strategic issues in the first 10 days of 2019. Well, one was related to the state of democracy in Canada, that’s not exactly a matter of great strategic import but it should be of concern to some of us. Look at these maps, please:…… Continue reading Just a thought (5): What happens next in the Middle East?
Dr. Emma Ashford, of the (generally conservative) Cato Institute, proposes that we, in the US led West, should reconsider what she calls our “reflexive hostility” towards Russia. Her remarks are addressed, in the main, towards US leaders but, of course, many in the chattering classes, which includes me, to be sure, are equally prone to take …… Continue reading Grand strategy: A new approach to Russia?