Terry Glavin, writing in MacLean's magazine, says that "With Beijing’s most determined allies decisively crushed by a democratic alliance in Hong Kong’s district elections over the weekend, at least somebody’s putting up some kind of a fight against Xi Jinping’s increasingly savage aggression and belligerence. Because it certainly isn’t Canada." He reminds us, as I … Continue reading We need to get Canada up off its knees
I have said before, again and again, in fact, that the Canadian Forces' command and control, superstructure is beyond fat or even bloated, it is, in my professional opinion, so morbidly obese as to be dangerous to our national defence. We have so many underemployed admirals and generals sitting in too many headquarters that do … Continue reading Time to cut the FAT!
I, and many others, have been worrying about the fate of the liberal international order, which I would argue began 202 years ago when, on June 18th 1815 the Duke of Welllington defeated Napoleon Bonaparte at Waterloo. I suppose that most people don't, automatically, associate Field Marshal Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington with liberal values … Continue reading The German dilemma
A few days ago I commented on an article by Professor Elinor Sloan entitled "Why peacekeeping needs bigger guns in 2016." Prof Sloan began her article by quoting from the UN's under-secretary-general for peacekeeping who, on being asked by some US senators what the UN needed for its missions replied: "attack helicopters." The article provoked … Continue reading The least that’s needed
Two things caught my eye over the past couple of days: First, from The Dispatch, an article by Lieutenant General (Ret'd) Mike Day, who was commander of Joint Task Force Two ( JTF 2) and, later, of Canada’s Special Operations Forces Command, entitled "NATO and Canada's national Interests;" and Second, from the Globe and Mail, an article … Continue reading The new cold war
David Akin, writing in the Toronto Sun, provides a "mid-term" report card on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and some of his ministers. He gives the PM (and PMO) an A+ for style and process, and I agree. But because of some real weakness of policy he lowers the overall grade to a B, which is … Continue reading First year, mid-term results
I have rattled on, possibly too long, about the problems that I see in National Defence and how I fear that the Defence Review will not (not be allowed to?) address them. Now my friend, retired Brigadier General Jim Cox, writing in the Vimy Report, has provided an excellent foundation from which you can consider … Continue reading Some things the Defence Review might consider (8): Good words from a trusted source