In the national interest

David Pugliese, one of only a tiny handful of Canadian journalists who writes knowledgeably about defence issues says, in a recent item in the Ottawa Citizen, that “the new CDS [Chief of the Defence Staff ~ the officer who replace retiring General Jon Vance] is expected to face the challenge of dealing with significant budget cuts because of the financial strain on federal coffers created by the novel coronavirus pandemic … [already] … Spending on various emergency relief programs has resulted in Canada’s deficit increasing to $343 billion this year, according to the federal government’s economic snapshot released in early July …[and Prime Minister] … Trudeau has acknowledged that the full economic impact of the pandemic is unknown. A second COVID-19 wave could further worsen the economic situation.

I explained, recently, why I think that is a poor idea. Now, retired Lieutenant General Michael Day says, on social media, that it’s possible but he notes that:

  1. The cuts, even HUGE cuts would be minuscule compared to the deficit because Canada’s defence budget it not a really large part of federal spending, unlike, say, the USA’s defence budget or even Australia’s;
  2. Major projects where big dollars are spent are already underway ~ contracts are signed, money is being spent, jobs are at stake, too;
  3. Defence spending injects considerable stimulus into the Canadian economy; and
  4. The last time the Government of Canada did this the impact was deleterious, lasted for decades and is, right now, costing billions to put right.

In fact a wise government might even increase defence spending because it might be a chance to aim some spending at specific communities. Our northern radar chain, for example, needs to be replaced ~ it is a vital part of our share of the continental defence burden; it’s not “discretionary.” But it is the sort if project which could be used as a springboard for a generations long effort aimed at improving First Nations communities by giving them responsibility for the construction and maintenance of what I assume will be large terrestrial radar sites. Ditto for e.g. shipbuilding and, perhaps, for armed helicopters for the Canadian Forces:

These, and other defence projects can have a favourable impact on the recovery if Canadian politicians are willing to act boldly and decisively and in the national interest. That means Canada needs a new government … one which does not include Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and Harjit Sajjan.

Published by Ted Campbell

Old, retired Canadian soldier, Conservative ~ socially moderate, but a fiscal hawk. A husband, father and grandfather. Published material is posted under the "Fair Dealing" provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act for the purposes of research, private study and education.

One thought on “In the national interest

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: