Skip to content
Ted Campbell's Point of View … an old soldier's thoughts on shoes and ships and sealing wax and many other things. I self describe as a classical liberal ~ which means, in 21st century Canada, that I’m a Conservative. I believe in four fundamental rights for each and every individual: Life, Liberty and Property, as described by John Locke in 17th century England, and Privacy, as defined by Brandeis and Warren in 19th century America. Your comments are welcome, but my views (and obvious biases) are pretty well established after 75+ years.

Ted Campbell's Point of View … an old soldier's thoughts on shoes and ships and sealing wax and many other things. I self describe as a classical liberal ~ which means, in 21st century Canada, that I’m a Conservative. I believe in four fundamental rights for each and every individual: Life, Liberty and Property, as described by John Locke in 17th century England, and Privacy, as defined by Brandeis and Warren in 19th century America. Your comments are welcome, but my views (and obvious biases) are pretty well established after 75+ years.

  • Contact

‘Trumpism’ is on the (global) rise

Posted byTed Campbell 2020-02-102020-02-09 4 Comments on ‘Trumpism’ is on the (global) rise

Fareed Zakaria, writing in the Washington Post, says that “President Trump’s speech Screen Shot 2020-01-24 at 11.48.51here at the World Economic Forum  … [in the week 20-24 January 20202] … went over relatively well. That’s partly because Davos is a conclave of business executives, and they like Trump’s pro-business message. But mostly, the president’s reception was a testament to the fact that he and what he represents are no longer unusual or exceptional. Look around the world and you will see: Trump and Trumpism have become normalized.“

The world, he says, is “deglobalizing.” He explains that “Global trade, which rose almost uninterruptedly since the 1970s, has stagnated, while capital flows have fallen. Net migration flows from poor countries to rich ones have also dropped. In 2018, net migration to the United States hit its lowest point in a decade … [and, he adds] … The shift in approach can best be seen in the case of India. In 2018, Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to Davos to decry the fact that “many countries are becoming inward focused and globalization is shrinking.” Since then, his government has increased tariffs on hundreds of items and taken steps to shield India’s farmers, shopkeepers, digital companies and many others from the dangers of international competition. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative recently called out India for having the highest tariffs of any major economy in the world.“

And, he says, “This phase of deglobalization is being steered from the top. The world’s leading nations are, as always, the agenda setters. The example of China, which has shielded some of its markets and still grown rapidly, has made a deep impression on much of the world. Probably deeper still is the example of the planet’s greatest champion of liberty and openness, the United States, which now has a president who calls for managed trade, more limited immigration and protectionist measures. At Davos, Trump invited every nation to follow his example. More and more are complying.”

This is ground that I and others have been covering for some time: the idea that people ~ ordinary, working and middle-class people ~ are tired of the sort of globalization that the Roosevelt and Truman administrations in America designed and implemented at the end of World War II and in the immediate post-war period. The essentially liberal, global, “new world order,” based on the historically sound notion that prosperous, (relatively) free trading nations are less likely to go to war than are poorer, more isolated ones, has worked marvellously well for billions of people … but at the apparent expense of a few million others, mainly in North-West Europe and America. We watched, in the 1970s, ’80s and ’90s as some heavy industries ~ steel production, auto-making and shipbuilding, for example ~ shifted from America and North-West Europe to Asia, especially, first, to Japan and then, quickly, to South Korea. Next, we watched as Asia rushed ahead in technology production ~ but not in technology creativity, that remained a solidly Anglo-American domain ~ and we saw our neighbours and ourselves driving Asian cars and watching Asian made TVs and listening to our music on Asian made tape players and solid-state devices. ‘Why,’ the people of the North American and Norther-West European rust belts asked ‘can we not make the steel and build the cars?’ Why can we not assemble the printed circuit boards?‘ There were a lot of answers, one of them was that Chinese and Philippines and Japanese and South Korean men and women were willing to work harder, and sometimes smarter, for less. But, now, in the 2020s, even the hardest working Asians are losing their jobs to even cheaper (over a life-span) and more efficient robots.

duterteNow, even the Asians are looking for their own Trumps … and they are finding the, too. President Trump tapped into a deep vein of fear that the implicit promise that if we worked harder then our children and grandchildren would have better and better lives has been abandoned by the political elites ~ by the Laurentian Elites in Canada. That dream seemed to fade, here in North America and in Western Europe, in the 1970s and ’80s. Now it is fading in Asia, too. And the people are turning to leaders who offer simple answers to complex questions.

Fareed Zakaria is partially correct. Much of the world, led by America, China, Europe and India,  is trying to “deglobalize,” because many people hope that they can, somehow, be nationally or regionally self-sufficient. But the genius of Adam Snith was his insight that specialization ~ tinsmiths and cobblers selling pots and shoes to farmers rather than each person trying to do everything for himself ~ was that he explained how we could all have more for our efforts. That was something that no one, else …

Karl_Marx_0013
publishable
trump-america-first

… not Karl Marx, not Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman, and certainly not Donald Trump, has been able to offer the world. In fact, globalization is just a natural extension of Smith’s local specialization argument. It achieves the common-sense utilitarian goal of producing the greatest good for the greatest number. When the great numbers of the ordinary people in America, Europe, China and India see their ‘good‘ being diminished by socialism and/or protectionism they will, almost certainly, move to “throw the rascals out,” politically, at least.

Trumpism is on the rise, and that rise is, indeed, on a global scale. I do not expect it to end quickly. As I have said before, I (confidently) expect President Trump to be re-elected in 2020 and I expect another, albeit much more polished and accomplished, Trumpian to succeed him in 2024. I expect that the pace of globalization will slow, somewhat, for a few decades, but it will pick up again, for two reasons:

  • First, it has, undeniably, lifted more people out of abject poverty than anything else 220px-Adam_Smith_The_Muir_portraitthat has ever been done in all of human history. It is, equally undeniably, a global “good thing,” even ~ perhaps especially ~ for America; and
  • Second, it is the logical extension of Adam Smith’s good, common-sense idea about specialization. It just makes good, utilitarian sense.

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted byTed Campbell2020-02-102020-02-09Posted inAsia, China, Conservative Politics, Donald Trump, Economics, Trade and Taxes, Europe, Free trade, Globalization, Innovation, Institutions, Liberalism and Values, Nikki Haley, Philippines, Soft power, South Korea, Taxes, USA, World Economic Forum, World Trade Organization

Published by Ted Campbell

Old, retired Canadian soldier, Conservative ~ socially moderate, but a fiscal hawk. A husband, father and grandfather. Published material is posted under the "Fair Dealing" provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act for the purposes of research, private study and education. View more posts

Post navigation

Previous Post Previous post:
Good questions
Next Post Next post:
Failing the test

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. colinpark says:
    2020-02-10 at 4:09 am

    Did any of the economic philosophers forsee the coming of robotics and account for AI development?

    Reply
    1. Ted Campbell says:
      2020-02-10 at 11:57 am

      None, that I have read. But some, F.A. Hayak, especially, foresaw the need for some sort of guaranteed income when too much labour was unemployable for any reason.

      Reply
  2. colinpark says:
    2020-02-10 at 5:39 pm

    But where does guaranteed income come from? Unemployed people don’t pay taxes, nor do they buy much in the way of goods. I think a major factor for robotically made goods is that supply will quickly outpace demand as consumers lose purchasing power. Plants that become to automated may face higher taxes or boycotts by remaining consumers in efforts to maintain some employment.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Out from under rocks – Ted Campbell's Point of View … an old soldier's thoughts on shoes and ships and sealing wax and many other things. I self describe as a classical liberal ~ which means, in 21st century Canada, that I’m a Cons
Leave a comment

Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Leave a comment

Recent posts

  • March 2021 (6)
  • February 2021 (35)
  • January 2021 (42)
  • December 2020 (42)
  • November 2020 (39)
  • October 2020 (51)
  • September 2020 (36)
  • August 2020 (36)
  • July 2020 (35)
  • June 2020 (38)
  • May 2020 (43)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (43)
  • February 2020 (47)
  • January 2020 (43)
  • December 2019 (48)
  • November 2019 (41)
  • October 2019 (39)
  • September 2019 (40)
  • August 2019 (39)
  • July 2019 (38)
  • June 2019 (36)
  • May 2019 (43)
  • April 2019 (41)
  • March 2019 (35)
  • February 2019 (38)
  • January 2019 (44)
  • December 2018 (39)
  • November 2018 (38)
  • October 2018 (44)
  • September 2018 (42)
  • August 2018 (43)
  • July 2018 (40)
  • June 2018 (40)
  • May 2018 (41)
  • April 2018 (46)
  • March 2018 (42)
  • February 2018 (38)
  • January 2018 (37)
  • December 2017 (39)
  • November 2017 (40)
  • October 2017 (43)
  • September 2017 (44)
  • August 2017 (39)
  • July 2017 (37)
  • June 2017 (32)
  • May 2017 (34)
  • April 2017 (34)
  • March 2017 (37)
  • February 2017 (37)
  • January 2017 (44)
  • December 2016 (47)
  • November 2016 (49)
  • October 2016 (51)
  • September 2016 (48)
  • August 2016 (47)
  • July 2016 (33)
  • June 2016 (58)
  • May 2016 (57)
  • April 2016 (62)
  • March 2016 (50)
  • February 2016 (63)
  • January 2016 (58)
  • December 2015 (31)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (11)

Archives

  • March 2021 (6)
  • February 2021 (35)
  • January 2021 (42)
  • December 2020 (42)
  • November 2020 (39)
  • October 2020 (51)
  • September 2020 (36)
  • August 2020 (36)
  • July 2020 (35)
  • June 2020 (38)
  • May 2020 (43)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (43)
  • February 2020 (47)
  • January 2020 (43)
  • December 2019 (48)
  • November 2019 (41)
  • October 2019 (39)
  • September 2019 (40)
  • August 2019 (39)
  • July 2019 (38)
  • June 2019 (36)
  • May 2019 (43)
  • April 2019 (41)
  • March 2019 (35)
  • February 2019 (38)
  • January 2019 (44)
  • December 2018 (39)
  • November 2018 (38)
  • October 2018 (44)
  • September 2018 (42)
  • August 2018 (43)
  • July 2018 (40)
  • June 2018 (40)
  • May 2018 (41)
  • April 2018 (46)
  • March 2018 (42)
  • February 2018 (38)
  • January 2018 (37)
  • December 2017 (39)
  • November 2017 (40)
  • October 2017 (43)
  • September 2017 (44)
  • August 2017 (39)
  • July 2017 (37)
  • June 2017 (32)
  • May 2017 (34)
  • April 2017 (34)
  • March 2017 (37)
  • February 2017 (37)
  • January 2017 (44)
  • December 2016 (47)
  • November 2016 (49)
  • October 2016 (51)
  • September 2016 (48)
  • August 2016 (47)
  • July 2016 (33)
  • June 2016 (58)
  • May 2016 (57)
  • April 2016 (62)
  • March 2016 (50)
  • February 2016 (63)
  • January 2016 (58)
  • December 2015 (31)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (11)
Follow Ted Campbell's Point of View … an old soldier's thoughts on shoes and ships and sealing wax and many other things. I self describe as a classical liberal ~ which means, in 21st century Canada, that I’m a Conservative. I believe in four fundamental rights for each and every individual: Life, Liberty and Property, as described by John Locke in 17th century England, and Privacy, as defined by Brandeis and Warren in 19th century America. Your comments are welcome, but my views (and obvious biases) are pretty well established after 75+ years. on WordPress.com
Ted Campbell's Point of View … an old soldier's thoughts on shoes and ships and sealing wax and many other things. I self describe as a classical liberal ~ which means, in 21st century Canada, that I’m a Conservative. I believe in four fundamental rights for each and every individual: Life, Liberty and Property, as described by John Locke in 17th century England, and Privacy, as defined by Brandeis and Warren in 19th century America. Your comments are welcome, but my views (and obvious biases) are pretty well established after 75+ years., Blog at WordPress.com.
Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    %d bloggers like this: