Asterix and Obelix?

David Pugliese, writing in the Ottawa Citizen, reports that “MV Asterix is now operating with HMCS Regina in Middle Eastern waters as part of a Canadian-led coalition task force.” He reminds us that “The Asterix, a commercial ship converted by Davie shipyards in Quebec and leased to the federal government to perform a military supply role, has been going almost non-stop since it was launched. It has refueled both Canadian and allied warships.

But, he says, “Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said there is no need for a second such interim supply ship and the head of the Royal Canadian Navy, Vice Admiral Ron Lloyd, says he is happy with having the Asterix as the force’s only supply ship until 2023 when the first of two Joint Support Ships, to be built at Seaspan in Vancouver, is expected to be ready.” But, he adds, Chantier Davie, Canada’s largest shipyard, “has offered to convert a second such ship, MV Obelix, to the same capabilities of Asterix and lease it to the government.

Again, as background, he reminds us that “At one point the navy had three of its own supply ships supporting its vessels,” and at other points in time defence experts said it needed four such ships to be properly effective as a global force and I also commented on this about six months ago.

Information recently tabled in Parliament,” David Pugliese says, “indicates that even though Asterix has been going full-tilt over the last year, there was still a requirement for Canadian warships to receive fuel and provisions from supply vessels operated by foreign navies or for Canadian ships to head to port to receive fuel and supplies.” Now, in fairness, ALL allied navies, even the huge and mighty United States Navy needs to “receive fuel and provisions from supply vessels operated by foreign navies or to head to port to receive fuel and supplies;” that’s one of the reasons we work with allies: to share the logistical burden. In fact this image, from an article that Matthew Fisher wrote for the Canadian Global Affairs Institute

The_MV_Asterix2

… shows Canada’s Asterix refuelling two American destroyers, simultaneously. Just as, Mr Pugliese tells us, Parliament reported that in 2018 Canada spent over $5 Million on “At sea replenishment by partner and allied naval ships” we know that the United States Navy paid Canada for the fuel and supplies those destroyers took from Asterix. There’s nothing wrong with that, it’s part of an allied system (called Smart Scheduling) that ensures that in any multi-national task group (which are quite common) every ship, from every nation, knows how to get fuel and supplies from every supply ship and the supply ships, sometimes from more than one nation, always have enough fuel, ammunition and supplies on board to support the task group. So, there’s nothing wrong with Canadian warships being refuelled by allied supply ships or in doing the reverse.

The problem is that even when the new supply ships from Seaspan are built, in the next decade, Canada will still not have enough to guarantee that we can deploy two task groups, simultaneously, in two oceans, and still have something in reserve. Canada needs four supply ships to operate a credible, blue water Navy.

Maybe the right answer is for this government (or, more likely the next one) to take up Davie‘s offer to build a sister ship to AsterixChantier Davie has already proposed that and has, tentatively, named it the Obelix. Or, maybe the better answer is to convert one or two much larger ships (displacing, say, 30,000± tons (as opposed to only 20,000+ tons for Asterix and for the as yet unbuilt Protecteur class supply ships) that are highly suitable for Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HA/DR) operations, for which the Royal Canadian Navy said, in Leadmark 2050, (page 47) “recent operations by the RCN and allied navies have highlighted a pressing need for the Canadian Armed Forces to consider the acquisition of a dedicated peace-support ship to meet the unique demands of HA/DR.

My guess, based on a lot of reading and listening but still just an informed guess, is that the RCN needs two of the fully military Protecteur class supply ships, currently being built by Seaspan, and two or perhaps even three converted support ships, leased from a builder/operator like Davie‘s Federal Fleet Services, which can do fleet resupply missions and are also suitable for HA/DR operations.

8 thoughts on “Asterix and Obelix?”

  1. Norway, Canada and Holland all wanted to build a JSS, only the Dutch built one. Other two countries balked at the cost. The Protecteur Class had limited deck space for a few shipping containers and DND pretends it is a JSS.

  2. Perhaps a silly question is there any room for profit in resupplying of military ships ? Because even a small profit would help justify an extra ship and even a small return is better than none.

    1. I’m not sure if a government could make a profit, but I, too, wonder if a private contractor, like Davie’s ‘Federal Fleet Services,’ could run a service using multiple supply ships, serving e.g. NATO or even a coalition like the RCN and USN or RAN and USN or some European navies, and show a profit. MV Asterix, like the RN’s Royal Fleet Auxilliary service, is a merchant ship, crewed by civilians, supporting a military function. Asterix has a small military contingent but I’m about 99.9% certain that civilians could be hired with the requisite skill sets.

  3. I hadn’t thought about it before, but RN would that be NAAFI on floats,( sorry silly morning)

  4. An opportunity to do for AOR what has been done for pilot training/aggressor training/EW in the RCAF? Everything I have read suggests that NATO has a chronic shortage of AOR assests

  5. Canadian Military procurements are a complex process that usually require a complex, costly, and time consuming solution. Occasionally Canada will get lucky and a straightforward solution, like the MV Asterix, will land on our doorstep. The “3P” approach to military procurement will kick in and we usually squander a great opportunity.

    1)Politics. Our current Prime Minister has taken a firm stand on the procurement of supply ships from Davie shipyard. Any change in his position and he may have to admit that he was wrong. Not likely to happen any time soon. Easier to dredge up a report or assessment from the military that the ships may not be needed. It serves to justify his actions and he has someone to blame if the issue goes South on him.

    2)Patronage. The Prime Minister has to consider the shipyards in the areas of the country that put him in power. These shipyards will claim that they should be offerred the chance to deliver a superior ship for a more competitive price. The MV Asterix is a proven concept in all areas. Davie has a second ship ready for conversion and has even offerred a sale price to get the project moving foreword. The chance that a competing Canadian shipyard could match or best this offer are slim to non existant.

    3)Posturing. The current Federal Government is all about future proposals for significant military procurement, as stated in their multiple press releases. They claim to have a long range plan to supply the Canadian Military with the equipment and funding necessary to create the military that Canada requires. It will all fall in to place just after the next federal election. The Canadian voter just needs to trust them on this. Have we not heard this tune before ?

    There has been a lot of press lately about the inability of Canada to project sovereignty in the Canadian Arctic. Consider a task force of two AOPS ships each with a Cyclone helicopter on board. Add in an Asterix style support ship with two more Cyclones, or a Chinook helicopter, on board. That would constitute a serious, and functional, military statement about Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic. Now add in the heavy icebreaker that was proposed under “Project Resolute” and you have a task force with significant range and all season capability.

  6. AOPS will NOT deploy with Cyclone helicopter except in unusual circumstances. Will be either CCG or RCMP.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s