Michael Valpy gets it

Long time Globe and Mail reporter and columnist and one-time NDP candidate Michael Valpy, who, now is a senior fellow at Massey College and a fellow at the School of Public Policy and Governance at the University of Toronto, gets it in an opinion piece in the Globe and Mail headlined: “Populist anger is real, and Canada had better wake up.” It is, by now, a pretty shop worn idea, but it is still worth some serious consideration by Canadians, especially by Canadian Conservatives.

On Nov. 9, 2016, the day after the election of Donald Trump as U.S. President,” Mr Valpy begins, “The New York Times posted a video by its media columnist, Jim Rutenberg, in which he declared that political journalism in America is broken … [and] … “Mainstream journalists who were covering this race and cover politics,” he said, “really didn’t understand the anger and … how many people held that anger toward the status quo – how widespread that was in the country. And it comes after we missed Brexit. It shows that the global media is having troubles keeping up with the changes in the world” … [and, again] … All of the foibles of Mr. Trump that drew so much media attention, Mr. Rutenberg concluded, “drew us away from the other part of the story, which was how some large percentage of this country thought about the way things are going.”

Mt Valpy says that “There is a big warning here for Canadian media commentators and the country’s political elites in general who are currently lecturing Conservative Party leadership candidates about fuelling populist anger and dismissing as ignorant, small 6a829f44-f746-41d7-8183-18f8eff7740c_500and mean the perturbations of their supporters who are expressing fear and resentment over how Canada is being run … [because] … Those supporters are real people – and there are a lot of them. Dismissing them and their concerns, however crudely they may be stated at times – as the U.S. media did with Americans who flocked to Mr. Trump’s standard – is frankly more likely to increase their numbers and more deeply entrench their anger and their (justifiable) sense of being held in contempt by the mainstream media and political establishment.

2016-5-29-minghui-canada-vipsupport-02The-Loop_Kevin-OLeary-Taxes_960This applies to me, of course, and to my often expressed disdain for Kevin O’Leary and my fear about what Brad Trost might do to our Conservative Party. If we, Conservatives, are silly enough to select either to lead our Party then we will deserve the shellacking that the Liberals will surely give us in the 2019 election. Neither Mr O’Leary, a dollar store celebrity, nor Mr Trost, a decent man, to be sure, but a paragon of the religious right,  has any discernible broad, national leadership qualities nor could either unite the Party, much less the country. Team Trudeau will wipe the electoral floor with either of them.

Frank Graves, the president of EKOS Research Associates and one of Canada’s leading pollsters,” Michael Valpy goes on to say, “talks about the evidence he is uncovering of deepening class conflict in the country … [and] … He finds that, since the beginning of the 21st century, the proportion of Canadians self-identifying as middle class has declined from 67 per cent to 46 per cent. Roughly the same numbers show up in U.S. polling. You have to ask: What would make someone wake up one morning and decide she or he is no longer middle class? … [further] … Over the past few years Mr. Graves has found a persistent and deepening pessimism among Canadians about their economic future, with racism, nativism and xenophobia appearing as byproducts of growing economic angst and resentment. He has found that almost 25 per cent of Canadians believe there is a good chance they will lose their jobs in the next couple of years. He has found that 70 per cent believe that almost all the economic growth over the past 20 years has ended up in the hands of the top 1 per cent … [and] … He has found persistently hardening attitudes to immigration and to the increase of visible minorities in the population, supporting the notion that we are closing – not opening – as a society and that our iconic multicultural identity is, to say the least, being questioned. Indeed, another recent poll showed that vetting immigrants for “Canadian values” – seen by critics of Conservative leadership candidate Kellie Leitch as her code language for discouraging non-white immigration – is favoured by 90 per cent of Conservative supporters and almost 60 per cent of Liberal and NDP supporters.

We should not be even a little surprised that Canadians share the same hopes and fears as Afghan university students shout anti-US slogans and hold a banner reading 'No Democracy; We want just Islam!' during a demonstration in Kabulour American neighbours and, therefore, we should not be surprised if many, many Canadians turn away from “establishment” politicians, like Erin O’Toole, and towards outsiders like Kevin O’Leary or towards candidates, like Kellie Leitch, sending thinly veiled messages about some immigrants. (and to be clear: I find a lot of merit in what Dr Leitch seems to believe about “values,” my opposition is to the specifics of here plan to screen only newcomers. I think the problem is broader and deeper.)

Some media personalities amplify the various “anti” messages as they try ezra-levant_0to launch a “fundamentalist” flanking attack on liberalism … but it is not clear, at least not to me, what they find wrong with “progressive” or “liberal” values other than the fact that it changes the traditional “face” of Canada. But their message does resonate and we should also not be surprised that anti-immigrant sentiment runs just as broadly and deeply in Canada as it does in the USA, or anywhere else.

These angry respondents are not people who are going to be waved off into silence by know-it-all media and political experts,” Michael Valpy says, “At some point, these people have to be listened to and have to be asked what will address their anger.

He concludes by explaining that he teaches “a course at the University of Toronto’s Scarborough campus on systemic biases and prejudices in media. A few weeks ago, I invited Nick Kouvalis, until recently Dr. Leitch’s campaign manager, into my class. He was asked why the media have been so dismissive of Dr. Leitch’s campaign message. He answered: “They’re not talking to the same people I am.” That is so like what transpired in the U.S. election.” Exactly! The media is just as guilty as anyone else, including me, of having a “confirmation bias.” Most journalists, like most people, are not anti-immigrant nor are they anti-liberal, and they don’t really want to hear inarticulate complaints about “others” and “strangers.” They, most journalists and most people, are neither afraid nor racist, but some, not most, but some people are one or the other or both. And they will be heard. All candidates, especially the “moderates” like Erin O’Toole need to hear and understand the voices of fear and anger and they need to offer them something concrete: border security; clear values; a plan to save jobs through free(er) trade; stronger defences; and a better future for their children and grand-children, and so on down the alphabet from aboriginal land claims to zebra mussel control.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s